A Revolution?

[Finally posted 11-29-11]
See "A wonder" (update) 11-22-11 And The Daily Show CTRL f cheese. Non Exclusive Maddow search later.

Original intent. Yogurt? No, Romney. No comma. Intestinal fortitude? Or bacterial tubes.
[Steele Matthews? kiss up ? Draft three? True Footnote. Punderous Pondering? Or bubble up?]
{Breaking a leg or trickle up? Jonathan Chaite. A romance with Obama? But what is relative? Salon pushes and the GOP? Thrilled by table. Another article in revolution.}
{This post is very anachronistic, not published yet. The links are but not "A Revolution". Speaking of tragedies, I forgot that today is the 48th observance of the assasination of President Kennedy.

Flow of Conscience

Not Exactly Either,
nor Out of the Box.
Speaking of Supply and Demand
or trickle down and bubble up.
No Dead C Scroll over, nor out.

Just a hint that things are not black and white,
nor up without down, let alone level or limited.
The original trigger was a conversation at a holiday party,
which I wished to amend here,
while John Dean and William James[***] were part of the head water or ledership.

[Speaking of flow, and roots or branches.]

[See Three Comments]
[Seg Way: E pit o'me[!]
/ I will now slightly edit a bit of above,
without adding any links as after thoughts unless noted.(see italics)]

[For the scroll-over challenged*, I will list the links in order...
(under construction I through XIX)
I Sciousness, wiki.
II Pandora, wiki.
III Theodicy, wiki.
IV Supply, blog search
V Demand, ibid.
VI slippery slope, ibid.
VII Power Broker, ibid.
VIII scroll, ibid.
IX ibid.,ibid[?]
X "Conservatives without Conscience"
XI "The Liberal Conscience"
XII Try-Unism
XIII google find "liberal conscience Dean"/Howard
XIV ibid. /Baker
XV "X & Y Chromo Somes", my blog
XVI "Image of Original In Tent", ibid.
XVII December 2011 archives, ibid.
XVIII "A PEAS Meant", ibid.
XIX "Post Script", ibid.
SEGUE:
Seg Elizabeth Warren replies to Karl Rove
Way Her way (video).
Epitome
[!] Sat Ire
A bit frayed at the edges.

*or to save you a trip

[See Comments up to the sixth, then I was Roving my web pages and found this. Speaking of Prophetic Tributes. Innocence bUy...to the good fight.]
[Speaking of frayed.**]

** see Seg Way source LA Times.
[***] 12-13-11 Correction to James(not Blake)

It is hard to say Herman means anything literally.

Or actually?

He did not say "I'm a leader not a reader",
nor did the Schwarzenegger.
It is about lede'er ship[!]

[11-21-11: As "A Wonder..." is held in draft, I am processing a Revolution. Speaking of Calm Cast, I didn't mean to forcast.]
[As for weather[!], recent Republican interference in presidential foreign policy* is dangerous** stuff, and further muddles the mess age and message. I don't know if anyone can ever be a Nixon to China after this administration, or a Cain to business.]

* recent event references not noted in link
** a,b
[note: [!] = (sic)or sarcasm/irony Also "A Wonder..." under construction.]
[Segue: good for?(sic?) NOT!]
[Just to be clear*** I am not opposed to six sigma or cuts, but there is a food chain, or some hierarchy which is bubble up. Incidentally, it is a lot like the cycle of life and climate change. The segue or root here is the cost effectiveness, not trickle down. Money is not the root of all evil, nor is any tool or process, necessarily.]

*** the NOT! is not fully read yet(NFRY)
[Speaking of not read yet, the point is in the lede, or prelede. It is easier to debunk, than bunker up. MORNING MESSAGE: America's Affluent and the New Bunker Down, literally(!?)]

F'N Too Point Oh[!]

[Footnote (2)Too for NOVEMBER 2012]
Scroll down for most recent.

First note:  F'N is fracked for Footnote[!]
[!]= sarcasm (sic) of sorts.
S.F. ** Keys? 88 Keys!(un Caps lock)
^LEGEND of sorts^   <=inserted 11-22-12

11-30-12 (fn) here is under construction. But label here, is currently as follows.
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2012/11/fact-references-to-al-qaeda-were.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/06/palin-reviving-fdr.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/03/recycling-trash.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/02/label-iv.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/01/course-change-2009.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/01/imaginingsgaza.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2008/09/breaking-news.html
http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2004/03/beating-around-bush-my-view-of-recent.html
Note: obviously hotlinks do not always remain active or productive.
But McCain may Rove on.

11-23-12  (b.s.) TBA {blog searches to be sorted}

11-22-12 Happy Thanksgiving!!!!!!! 
C-VC(viscous cycle of sorts)  <=scroll over
b.s. viscous
In "F"n able?
Politics is local?
Rubber/Glue "Unhinged".
b.s. cycle
Fair and Balanced
Yikes! 3.0 to the N'th?
b.s. sorts
Missed  Train ;-) / Jumped Tracks "of sorts".

11-9-12 :  (fn) sh-cap-subtitle"Nov (fn)" Here too done dat!
"Stop that" Ann Romney Ref.
aka M-F Re(fn)...b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l,  m,  n,  Blank that ?^ [!^^].
^for later signing statement?
^^ sung by (day oh?)*donne dunce see
* F3,here is Ftoo, and (fn) for nav labels later. Trickle-Down v Bubble Up!(Reaganomics v. Obamanomics) [b thru n on file xfinity...]

11-10-12 F'up? Scroll upNdown/or...  }eMoat_iConn{
In respect for who knows W T F
I will not proceed with further foto processing for the time being.

FC "Hammer"

Just the two of us?
Just because you have a hammer, everything is not a nail!*
See 3 PO

*Rookiepedia?(not wookie weally^ nor babawawa)
(fn)
True dat ? % $ (day oh?)



^ final insert (post image & F1-3)

[But really, the public option^^ is not just the health care but the democracy. Not to cap and trade or recycle old memes, but to reframe. Cap and trade is a term that may be DOA, but it is the congress and the market stupid.]
^^ returning to text later, not to un context but conn text in the form of revisiting footnotes for Hammer Time/Maslow Try Angle.  Heck, this is good enough for trickle down or bubble up. You google or wiki and U-tubes. (or scroll over and click)
[Editors Note:  Photo is mine from 88Keys, I told you everything was relative.[^^^] See(labels)/CtrlF Olympus D-550 (image-#5) shot # 2 (can still use a zoom and crop later)]

[^^^]: as I recall this is where I had an earlier mis-insert. i.e. elative(sic)
Note: Missing link caught 11-10-12 & there are two separate links under [^^^]'s.
Result: r"elative" link returned to earlier unintended insert, hopefully now "as was".

11-22-12 [C-VC]

Fair and Balanced and Centrist?

Whether you are a trickle-down Tea Partier or a Bubble-Up Egghead, not to mention the victims of ad hominem, ad group'em, ad label'em, add lose'em rhetoric or its perpetrator, The New Yorker might be part of the problem. But maybe it's my problem* or maybe they have made progress ***.

Speaking of bull or the Rodeo Clown, we should ponder who is the bull and who is the cowboy in that self- prescription. Not to mention Irony.

* I'm actually a great admirer but thought it might be too out there **for others

** link is post hock (or add: pre-pawn)

***BOTTOM LINE: If you can get past Newt Gingrich and his "post-modern" interpetations of his "democratic socialist" buddies Camus and Orwell, it is a fair and balanced whack at a "comprehensive" problem, and I think the Hopi-ChangeY thing has a... quiver.

{embedded words: made progress(read link),bull(USATodayWeekend), Rodeo Clown(David Sirota), self (Bill Bennett), prescription(Dr. Dean), Irony(Robert Reich), too out there(Beck),comprehensive(Lamar Alexander), problem(cheap shot), quiver} (->)(see comment & ribble)

i.e. sometimes a scroll over of the embedded words(links) in this post will merit a full read or hint that will assist in context.(<-)

I'm sorry?

Did I hear that right? I will have to dig up a link later, but this is about the denial that Bush is still in, and the qualification Wells Fargo (CEO or someone) made, about the bail out not going for executive salaries. It is unfair for me to begin this blast without further digging, but just the surface sod is soaked with effluence. So I will sort some key words from the Bush: "capitalism" in conjunction/contrast to "free market".

With Wells Fargo it is a matter of bookkeeping and an earlier flip-flop it seems, on the matter of what the bailout is going for... are we rescuing failing institutions or helping those that are efficient? In this case I have rather unparsed and taken a tangent from the trickle-down of the bonus problem, but there is a righteous problem about the housing bubble and fundamentals.

Maybe a graphic form will help:
Capitalism - - Free Market
Bonuses - - Book Keeping
Rescue - - Help
Bubble - - Fundamentals
Meaning, Myth, Model, Metaphor; may be my mantra,
but there is a cycle that needs work.

And to my estimation (tergiversate[**] or not) the housing bubble is a result of a fundamental flaw in economics. It works for those that buy it. But it really matters what the it is. Not to mention who sells it.

Not to mention the media again: WWWWWH? I might return to give more particular sources, but for now I leave with the answer: who, what, when, where, why, and how? as well as note the only labels at this time are Progressive Media and Thom Hartmann, and if I return I will [bracket][*$*]changes.[*]

[* as soon as I finished this and bracketed that, I thought, and must note that I have now made minor edits (& bold) for clarity sake, unbracketed.]

[** I wonder if I am a De-tergiversator ***?]

[*** I had to go old school and open a book, the answer is; not if it is (the latter) to change one's opinion, but may be others, not the De. Yeah, the De and the Un.]

[*$*] passing the buck I have not returned but simply connected here

Romney Mumbles Economy

"It's coming back."  Cincinatti
verse us
Obama turns it around...in Cleveland.

[Comments filed yesterday:  Norman Goldman  President had congress**?  Mitt Robney,
If it is possible to be wrong in two dimensions, Raw Money might be able.  At least he is wrong twice in one claim in regards to Obama and the economic turn around.  But while two wrongs don’t make a right. Two rights do make a turn around, but not two lefts.  Well it is a matter of degrees.  (‘scuse me Mitt RobbedMe*) 

Anyway, back to the two wrongs, A.) the President can’t turn the economy around, congress passes all legislation.  B.) the economy has turned around.  C.) turning it around again will be the wrong direction.  D.) There is plenty of turn left.

There is plenty of dispute about how and how much to turn.  There is even plenty of dispute as to how much it was turned.  But there is no disputing that the economy has been turned around and it is still being turned.]

As for "Talk is cheap"? ** Just ask Wisconsin and the V.A., not to mention the middle-class and home equity.  Bubble-up is more economical than trickle-down.   

* Wed. & Thurs. openings
** not frackin' really

[Of course it was mumbled(aka nuanced), it was anachronistic, dependent on looking back.]
http://www.electmitt2012.org/ Quote: "Mitt Romney is focused on implementing a set of conservative principles to reinforce the America we once knew."

Mitt might just be me, but I find it hard to find the Cincinnati speech in full text or video.
Romney Pac Charlie Brown ads running on or from Congressional Budget acts.  Choice or Referendum?  Compare or Retreat.
Martin Bashir
Lawrence O'Donnell

From GOP to NOP

From Grand Old Party to New Old Party.
So much for Mis-Ledership...
By which I mean having a clear heading.


Actually I an not really sure what is new or old, as the Koch connection to Cain precedes the Rove connection to Palin, at least as far as McCain.
Note: "connection"s are not "fair and balanced"
But my point is that there is a supposed split in the Republican party, but the devil is in the details. And working the refs?
[Game Buffet Metaphor, or trickle down verse us bubble-up?: an un-pop quiz]

[OW no MOW] The Ohio/Wisconsin Michigan derailment

Update: "Off The Cliff"

Maybe we are on a ledge now.
But a few things are clearer including fundamentals, except where what Obama said is anything like what McCain said.
[BONUS UPDATE[*]: Organizing For America And More]

In that vein (of the lead update) I append this economic perspective:

And throw out this idea to be reality checked:
a cap in the derivative process.

It seems that the real problem in the financial crisis was the packaging of investments (derivatives) that made them an increasing gamble and risk and further blew up the bubble. This may have already been addressed with new regulation and management, I am not sure. (It still seems a potential for ponzi or pyramid scheme, which furthers government interdependence. But with a clearer understanding of the Cap and Trade for Carbon emissions, maybe this could work for other issues and would have an impacted in guiding our values back to people rather than profits and away from a reliance on blowing things.

While this may be an example of too creative thinking, and too similar to the way I began this dialogue, I hope someone can grasp any threads which they might pull or weave for us. On the other hand a particular part of the Reich piece points to my need for better understanding of an impact. In the area of education reform and Obamanomics: "It cuts subsidies to banks participating in the student-loan program, which is exactly what Bill Clinton did, and it provides some funds for early childhood education." But I guess this just demonstrates the bottom up and balanced approach that in the context of the college tax credits and pell grant increases are necessary. (therefore not "on the other hand")

For a short allegory (enticing heading aside) on how we are all in this together, I just updated:(see ledge now: under construction) (3-18-09)
Since I have possibly dispelled my own concern regarding the one possible glitch in Obamanomics, I leave with another to dispel or verify. How is it that there can be a concern for imagined trickle-down opportunity being dashed by taxes, when business expenses are not really on the table? Food for thought? Or the recycler?

P.S. For a more deeply embedded compendium of sorts, where I picked on Chris Matthews (In an aside) and picked up on Jon Stewart(FNBC). And as far a fundamentals of McCain and Obama it is in the media that the difference lies as much as earmarks when it comes to comparing apples and oranges or pork and ham where we have a rotisserie of meaning and values and what is being skewered or brings stock aid to mind.

[And this addendum: Go Stephanie Miller! Thanks for being on CNN to balance Tucker'd out. And it is more than just funny, but that I have only stumbled on this now, and it is deeper and more on message than just video or Unsatire as the world evolves.]

[*] CORRECTION: These are not bonus links. At least the first is right on target at the fundamental difference: focus, fix and the press.

[Update 3-20-09: I never really did read Off The Cliff but used it as an allegorical leap, but here is a good point which it may have taken me some time to get to in the link I had.]

Hold your head up Paul Krugman!

Reform Is Needed. Reform Is in the Air. We Can't Afford to Fail.Truthout.org by: Joseph Stiglitz | Visit article original @ The Guardian UK

Geithner's Plan Will Tax Main Street to Make Wall Street Richer by Dean Baker Truthout.org or Huffington Post

Paul Krugman rounds out or triangles out the table. I will only make one comment in that the bottom line is the people, and since the trickle down has caused an economic bubble if not civilization to go up in smoke and mirrors, that the burden is there on that bottom line, while the money is in the clouds. OK, now I'm rolling. But seriously, I am not sure if we are caught between salting the clouds and salting a mine, but Humpty Dumpty * needs help. Are these the Three Musketeers?
[*] Pre-Post-or-us? links embedded: A Plea to Congress ! Between the charges ? "Off a Cliff" And do we have d'Artagnan on The Fence?